Nyesom-Wike-is-Not-Above-Accountability:-The-Lessons-of-Napoleon-Bonaparte,-Adolf-Hitler,-Muamah-Gaddafi,-Mobutu-Sese Seko

Nyesom Wike is Not Above Accountability: The Lessons of Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolf Hitler, Muamah Gaddafi, Mobutu Sese Seko

Allison Doubra
October 23, 2024


Former Rivers State Governor and current FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike, has positioned himself as a force to be reckoned with in Nigeria’s political landscape. His defiant attitude and recent proclamations regarding the political turmoil in Rivers State show a man who believes he can act without repercussions. In a recent broadcast on Symphoni TV, Wike asserted that no one could intimidate him, emphasizing his determination to make decisions based solely on his will, regardless of external opposition. However, this arrogance and seeming disregard for accountability bring to mind historical figures who once believed themselves to be untouchable but met disgraceful ends. Wike should remember that no man is infallible, and history has a way of humbling those who consider themselves above the law.

The Folly of Believing One is Untouchable

Nyesom Wike’s assertion that “nobody can intimidate me” is the hallmark of a man who views himself as untouchable. Wike’s defiance, particularly his insistence that he will act as he pleases, mirrors the attitudes of other political leaders throughout history who thought they were above reproach. The danger of such a mindset is the belief that one’s power is limitless. This, in turn, leads to a refusal to accept dissent, constructive criticism, or even legal processes meant to hold leaders accountable. In Wike’s case, his insistence that impeachment is not a military coup and that he can act without concern for rumors is a clear indicator of his overconfidence.

Historical Figures Who Fell From Grace

Wike should take note of several historical figures who, much like him, believed themselves to be invincible, only to face disgrace and downfall. These personalities serve as a stark reminder that no leader, no matter how powerful, is immune to the consequences of overreach and arrogance.

1. Napoleon Bonaparte

Napoleon, once Emperor of France, believed his military genius and power would secure him eternal dominance over Europe. His arrogance led him to overextend his empire, culminating in his defeat at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815. Napoleon was exiled to the island of Saint Helena, where he spent his final years in isolation, stripped of the empire he once ruled. Napoleon’s downfall serves as a reminder that no leader, no matter how grand their ambitions, can escape the consequences of overreaching their power.

2. Adolf Hitler

Hitler’s belief in his own supremacy and the invincibility of Nazi Germany led him to plunge the world into the deadliest conflict in human history, World War II. Hitler’s refusal to listen to advisors, coupled with his overconfidence in his military strategies, ultimately led to his downfall. By the end of the war, Germany lay in ruins, and Hitler took his own life to avoid capture. His regime, which once appeared unstoppable, ended in utter disgrace. Wike’s disregard for the voices around him, his dismissal of due process, and his assumption that no one can challenge him reflect a dangerous similarity to this kind of unchecked hubris.

3. Muammar Gaddafi

The late Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi ruled his country with an iron fist for over four decades, believing that his power was unassailable. Gaddafi suppressed opposition and clung to power through fear and intimidation. However, during the Arab Spring of 2011, Gaddafi’s arrogance blinded him to the growing dissent within his own country. He dismissed the possibility of being overthrown, but his downfall was swift and brutal. Gaddafi’s fate is a cautionary tale for leaders who believe that their power is eternal.

4. Mobutu Sese Seko

Former dictator of Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo), Mobutu Sese Seko, presided over one of the most corrupt regimes in African history. He was notorious for his lavish lifestyle, self-aggrandizement, and the suppression of political opponents. For years, Mobutu believed he could control every aspect of Zairean politics. However, in the 1990s, as economic collapse and civil unrest grew, Mobutu’s grip on power weakened. In 1997, after 32 years of rule, he was overthrown and forced into exile, where he died in disgrace. Mobutu’s story should remind Wike that the tides of power can shift quickly, and those who overestimate their strength may find themselves abandoned.

Wike’s Misconceptions About Power

Wike’s statements suggest a dangerous misconception about political power—that it is permanent and that the law serves the powerful. His assertion that impeachment is not a military coup is correct in principle; however, it reveals an indifference to the processes meant to check executive power. Impeachment, as he acknowledged, is a constitutional process designed to hold leaders accountable for actions that violate their office. Wike’s cavalier attitude toward impeachment and his insistence that he will act as he pleases signal a fundamental misunderstanding of democracy’s checks and balances.

The Consequences of Arrogance

While Wike may feel emboldened by his current position, history shows that unchecked arrogance often leads to downfall. Leaders who believe they are beyond reproach inevitably find themselves facing consequences they never anticipated. Wike’s refusal to recognize the importance of accountability and his dismissal of opposing voices may seem like strength in the short term, but such attitudes rarely end well.

The impeachment process he so casually discusses is not a tool for political maneuvering but a serious mechanism for ensuring that leaders act within the boundaries of the law. By positioning himself as immune to criticism or impeachment, Wike risks alienating not only political allies but also the electorate who expect their leaders to be held accountable.

Conclusion: Wike’s Fate is in His Own Hands

Nyesom Wike’s belief that no one can intimidate him may give him a temporary sense of control, but history has shown time and again that leaders who believe they are above accountability eventually fall. Whether through constitutional processes like impeachment or the shifting tides of public opinion, leaders who overestimate their power inevitably meet their downfall. Wike should learn from history and realize that no one, no matter how powerful, is above the law or beyond the reach of accountability.

The question for Wike now is whether he will heed the lessons of history or continue down a path of arrogance that has led so many before him to disgrace. As he faces growing tensions and political challenges, Wike must understand that true leadership is about humility and accountability, not unchecked defiance. If he fails to recognize this, he may very well find himself on the wrong side of history—just like Napoleon, Hitler, Gaddafi, and Mobutu before him



Post a Comment

0 Comments